关键追问Key opening question问题的底层约束是什么？Which constraint is truly limiting scale right now, and what gets dramatically better if the system compounds from here?
这是 山姆·奥特曼 在复杂问题前会先回到的起点。
This is the question Sam Altman would return to before rushing into action.
底层支柱Core pillarsAGI / 创业 / 分发AGI / startups / distribution
课程内容始终围绕这三根支柱组织，而不是零散知识点。
The lesson is organized around these three pillars rather than isolated quotations.
For Altman, distribution is only meaningful when it compounds through users, infrastructure, and distribution at the same time. This lesson is about learning when distribution deserves to lead and when it has to be balanced by AGI and startups.
Remember the operating sentence, not just the quote. The lesson works only when it changes how you order attention.
课后动作Next actions
找出你最近一个决策，复盘当时有没有明确把 分发 作为主变量。Revisit one recent decision and ask whether distribution was explicitly examined or only implied.
列出两个支持 分发 的证据，和一个提醒你别走极端的反证。Write one argument for leaning harder into distribution and one argument for restraint.
在接下来 24 小时里，用 分发 重看一个你原本准备凭直觉决定的选择。Use distribution to re-read a choice you were about to settle by intuition alone.
研讨题Seminar prompts
这一根支柱最容易被误用成什么样的口号？What is the most common slogan-version misreading of this pillar?
在场景“当新技术刚冒头、叙事很大但工程现实很硬时，如何判断是否跟进。”里，这个概念应该先被看见，还是先被验证？In the scenario '当新技术刚冒头、叙事很大但工程现实很硬时，如何判断是否跟进。', should this concept be noticed first or validated first?
如果把这一概念拿掉，整套系统最先失去哪一种判断能力？If you remove this concept from the system, what kind of judgment fails first?
For the next 7 days, run this lesson inside one real problem. Each day, log one decision through the opening question: Which constraint is truly limiting scale right now, and what gets dramatically better if the system compounds from here? and note what you examined first, what you ignored, and what sequence you would change on the next pass.